🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.